On 2015/3/5 9:53, Wang Nan wrote: >> ... >> > >>> >> /* kprobe is available. */ >>> >> KP_STG_AVAIL, >> > >> > KP_STG_EARLY is better, isn't it? :) > Sure. I will change it. >
Sorry, I remembered the reason why I call it KP_STG_AVAIL. What about .config turns off CONFIG_EARLY_KPROBES? In fact, in my WIP v5 series, the progress valued are introduced earlier than early kprobe. At that time the principle of KP_STG_EARLY should not be created. What do you think? Thank you. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
