On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 11:33:06AM +0000, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 05/03/2015 at 11:04:11 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote : > > > > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and > > > > an > > > > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device > > > > driver > > > > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events > > > > (signalling > > > > > > And genuine question, should we use British English or American English > > > or we don't care ? > > > > Have I written something that isn't valid American English there? I read > > over this a few times and failed to spot anything obvious. > > > > I'm happy to change for consistency, I generally assume that's the most > > important thing. > > I'd say signalling vs signaling. I actually had to look up which one was > correct. I'm personally using Incorrect/Broken English so I'm definitely > not here to give lessons.
Easy option to keep everyone happy: s/signalling/indicating/ That should be valid for the English variants I'm aware of, and it has the same number of characters so we don't need to reflow the text. Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
