On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 13:23 +0200, Anda-Maria Nicolae wrote:
> Fix coding style to comply with checkpatch.pl

I think these are unnecessary changes.

The current version of checkpatch should not emit
a warning for the original code.

> diff --git a/drivers/power/bq2415x_charger.c b/drivers/power/bq2415x_charger.c
[]
> @@ -352,8 +352,7 @@ static int bq2415x_exec_command(struct bq2415x_device *bq,
>                       BQ2415X_BIT_CE);
>               if (ret < 0)
>                       return ret;
> -             else
> -                     return ret > 0 ? 0 : 1;
> +             return ret > 0 ? 0 : 1;

maybe return !ret

>       case BQ2415X_CHARGER_ENABLE:
>               return bq2415x_i2c_write_bit(bq, BQ2415X_REG_CONTROL,
>                               0, BQ2415X_BIT_CE);
> @@ -426,20 +425,17 @@ static enum bq2415x_chip bq2415x_detect_chip(struct 
> bq2415x_device *bq)
>               case 0:
>                       if (bq->chip == BQ24151A)
>                               return bq->chip;
> -                     else
> -                             return BQ24151;
> +                     return BQ24151;
>               case 1:
>                       if (bq->chip == BQ24150A ||
>                               bq->chip == BQ24152 ||
>                               bq->chip == BQ24155)
>                               return bq->chip;
> -                     else
> -                             return BQ24150;
> +                     return BQ24150;
>               case 2:
>                       if (bq->chip == BQ24153A)
>                               return bq->chip;
> -                     else
> -                             return BQ24153;
> +                     return BQ24153;
>               default:
>                       return BQUNKNOWN;
>               }
> @@ -450,8 +446,7 @@ static enum bq2415x_chip bq2415x_detect_chip(struct 
> bq2415x_device *bq)
>               case 0:
>                       if (bq->chip == BQ24156A)
>                               return bq->chip;
> -                     else
> -                             return BQ24156;
> +                     return BQ24156;
>               case 2:
>                       return BQ24158;
>               default:
> @@ -480,8 +475,7 @@ static int bq2415x_detect_revision(struct bq2415x_device 
> *bq)
>       case BQ24152:
>               if (ret >= 0 && ret <= 3)
>                       return ret;
> -             else
> -                     return -1;
> +             return -1;
>       case BQ24153:
>       case BQ24153A:
>       case BQ24156:
> @@ -491,13 +485,11 @@ static int bq2415x_detect_revision(struct 
> bq2415x_device *bq)
>                       return 0;
>               else if (ret == 1)
>                       return 1;
> -             else
> -                     return -1;
> +             return -1;
>       case BQ24155:
>               if (ret == 3)
>                       return 3;
> -             else
> -                     return -1;
> +             return -1;
>       case BQUNKNOWN:
>               return -1;
>       }



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to