Hi, On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 04:03:26PM +0530, Jenny TC wrote: > Introduce power_supply charger control interfaces to control > charging from charging framework like charger-manager. The interfaces > are similar to the existing power supply get/set interfaces, but > introduce a different set of properties in order to differentiate > itself from other power supply properties which exposed in sysfs > > Signed-off-by: Jenny TC <[email protected]> > --- > include/linux/power_supply.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/power_supply.h b/include/linux/power_supply.h > index 30145d8e..a80a3ef 100644 > --- a/include/linux/power_supply.h > +++ b/include/linux/power_supply.h > @@ -176,6 +176,32 @@ union power_supply_propval { > struct device; > struct device_node; > > +enum psy_charger_control_property { > + PSY_CHARGER_PROP_ENABLE_CHARGING = 0, > + PSY_CHARGER_PROP_ENABLE_CHARGER, > + PSY_CHARGER_PROP_RESET_WDT, > +}; > + > +/** > + * struct power_supply_charger - power supply charger driver > + * @get_property: get property function to retrieve charger properties > defined > + * in enum power_supply_charger_property > + * @set_property: get property function to retrieve charger properties > defined > + * in enum power_supply_charger_property > + * > + * This structure is used by charger drivers to register with power supply > + * charging driver > + */ > + > +struct power_supply_charger { > + int (*get_property)(struct power_supply_charger *psyc, > + enum psy_charger_control_property pspc, > + union power_supply_propval *val);
The charging framework can simply call the same get_property
as used by sysfs. This is already done by all kind of drivers.
> + int (*set_property)(struct power_supply_charger *psyc,
> + enum psy_charger_control_property pspc,
> + const union power_supply_propval *val);
I guess this is needed for values, which are supposed to be
writable by the kernel / charging framework, but non-writable
by the sysfs. I suggest to add set_property_kernel() instead
(and make the above properties part of enum power_supply_property)
> +};
> +
> struct power_supply {
> const char *name;
> enum power_supply_type type;
> @@ -200,6 +226,8 @@ struct power_supply {
> void (*external_power_changed)(struct power_supply *psy);
> void (*set_charged)(struct power_supply *psy);
>
> + struct power_supply_charger *psy_charger;
Why is this a pointer?
> +
> /*
> * Set if thermal zone should not be created for this power supply.
> * For example for virtual supplies forwarding calls to actual
-- Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
