Hi Wolfram,

On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 01:24 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > Presented like this I wonder if this merits being a dev_err at all.
> > > Wouldn't dev_dbg be more adequate? This might remove the need for the
> > > condition and also avoid bothering everyone if something in the platform
> > > device structures or device tree is not right.
> > > 
> > > >                 return irq; /* -ENXIO */
> > > >         }
> > 
> > We've just had similar discussion related to DW APB UART with Andy here
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/3/412
> > 
> > So yes probably we may safely remove error message from here completely.
> 
> So, do you want to send a V2?

Sorry for this delay - I was away for last few days.
I'm about to send v2 with removal of error message completely.

-Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to