> > Presented like this I wonder if this merits being a dev_err at all. > > Wouldn't dev_dbg be more adequate? This might remove the need for the > > condition and also avoid bothering everyone if something in the platform > > device structures or device tree is not right. > > > > > return irq; /* -ENXIO */ > > > } > > We've just had similar discussion related to DW APB UART with Andy here > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/3/412 > > So yes probably we may safely remove error message from here completely.
So, do you want to send a V2?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
