On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> wrote: > * Bin Liu <binml...@gmail.com> [150309 14:17]: >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 04:11:28PM -0500, Bin Liu wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> wrote: >> >> > Add a minimal driver for dm816x USB. Otherwise we can just use >> >> > the existing musb_am335x and musb_dsps on dm816x. >> >> >> >> dm816x has the almost identical usbss as that in am335x, we should be >> >> able to adopt musb_am335x and musb_dsps for dm816x, and dm814x too? >> > >> > Tony's using the same musb glue layers, this is just a phy driver, >> > right ? >> >> Can the current am335x phy driver be adopted too? I remember it is >> under drivers/usb/phy/. > > Yes this is just the phy, other than that things work the same. > > I believe this is different from the am335x phy, and more similar to > what we have in old drivers/usb/musb/davinci.c. Chances are dm814x > is same as am335x phy.
Alright, I only played the dm814x board a few times, but never with dm816x, and thought dm816x and dm814x usbss are the same and very close to am335x - am335x came out later than dm81xx and has some improvement in usbss. > > But yeah, we really should do a proper phy driver for am335x too > along the same lines. Might even be be able to combine those drivers > with just different compatible values to set the quirks and the > enable/disable functions. Ok, I agreed we can make dm816x working first, then gradually move am335x aligned to the framework. Regards, -Bin. > > Regards, > > Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
