Hi Maxime, On 03/13/2015 06:55 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > From: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.st...@gmail.com> > > This adds documentation of device tree bindings for the > STM32 reset controller. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.st...@gmail.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/reset/st,stm32-rcc.txt | 102 > +++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/st,stm32-rcc.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/st,stm32-rcc.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/st,stm32-rcc.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..962f961 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/st,stm32-rcc.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ > +STMicroelectronics STM32 Peripheral Reset Controller > +==================================================== > + > +The RCC IP is both a reset and a clock controller. This documentation only > +document the reset part. > + > +Please also refer to reset.txt in this directory for common reset > +controller binding usage. > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: Should be "st,stm32-rcc" > +- reg: should be register base and length as documented in the > + datasheet > +- #reset-cells: 1, see below > + > +example: > + > +rcc: reset@40023800 { > + #reset-cells = <1>; > + compatible = "st,stm32-rcc"; > + reg = <0x40023800 0x400>; > +}; > + > +Specifying softreset control of devices > +======================================= > + > +Device nodes should specify the reset channel required in their "resets" > +property, containing a phandle to the reset device node and an index > specifying > +which channel to use. > + > +example: > + > + timer2 { > + resets = <&rcc 256>; > + }; > + > +List of indexes for STM32F429: > + - gpioa: 128 > + - gpiob: 129 > + - gpioc: 130 > + - gpiod: 131 > + - gpioe: 132 > + - gpiof: 133 > + - gpiog: 134 > + - gpioh: 135 > + - gpioi: 136 > + - gpioj: 137 > + - gpiok: 138 > + - crc: 140 > + - dma1: 149 > + - dma2: 150 > + - dma2d: 151 > + - ethmac: 153 > + - otghs: 157 > + - dcmi: 160 > + - cryp: 164 > + - hash: 165 > + - rng: 166 > + - otgfs: 167 > + - fmc: 192 > + - tim2: 256 > + - tim3: 257 > + - tim4: 258 > + - tim5: 259 > + - tim6: 260 > + - tim7: 261 > + - tim12: 262 > + - tim13: 263 > + - tim14: 264 > + - wwdg: 267 > + - spi2: 270 > + - spi3: 271 > + - uart2: 273 > + - uart3: 274 > + - uart4: 275 > + - uart5: 276 > + - i2c1: 277 > + - i2c2: 278 > + - i2c3: 279 > + - can1: 281 > + - can2: 282 > + - pwr: 284 > + - dac: 285 > + - uart7: 286 > + - uart8: 287 > + - tim1: 288 > + - tim8: 289 > + - usart1: 292 > + - usart6: 293 > + - adc: 296 > + - sdio: 299 > + - spi1: 300 > + - spi4: 301 > + - syscfg: 302 > + - tim9: 304 > + - tim10: 305 > + - tim11: 306 > + - spi5: 308 > + - spi6: 309 > + - sai1: 310 > + - ltdc: 31 > + >
Last line is un-necessary. When I applied this patch for test "new blank line at EOF" happen. +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/st,stm32-rcc.txt @@ -99,4 +99,3 @@ List of indexes for STM32F429: - spi6: 309 - sai1: 310 - ltdc: 31 - Thanks, Chanwoo Choi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/