On 12/03/15 22:57, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:51:17PM +0200, Adrian Hunter escreveu: >> On 11/03/2015 9:33 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>> We'll get that sorted out eventually. Sorry for the flux, but its trying >>> to get it to a better, more fine grained state. > >>>> I will send another revision of the patch set, but I am also >>>> considered renaming everything from "itrace" to something more >>>> generic. Possibly "auxtrace" or "hwtrace". Any preferences? > >>> That should match whatever name is used for the kernel facility it will >>> handle.... both auxtrace and hwtrace looks too ambiguous... > >>> cputrace perhaps? > >> "cputrace" sounds a bit like what perf already does. I am leaning toward >> "auxtrace" which got Andi's vote. > >> It is possible Peter is waiting on perf tools patches before >> moving the kernel driver patches. Are you amenable to taking >> more of my patches or are you waiting on the Alex's driver patches? > > Can't this be submitted together? And with instructions about how to > test it, which hardware supports it, etc, so that we can try to find > hardware inside our corporate walls and test this as one piece?
As Alex pointed out to me, his patches are already in Peter's queue - they can't be resubmitted. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
