* Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:54:22PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > I.e. something like this (mockup) output: > > > > > > > > SUMMARY (page allocator) > > > > ======================== > > > > > > > > Pages allocated+freed: 12,593 [ 51,630,080 bytes ] > > > > > > > > Pages allocated-only: 2,342 [ 1,235,010 bytes ] > > > > Pages freed-only: 67 [ 135,311 bytes ] > > > > > > > > Page allocation failures : 0 > > > > > > Looks a lot better! > > > > > > One thing I need to tell you is that the numbers are not pages but > > > requests. > > > > Yes, but in the MM code we tend to call larger order allocations > > 'pages' as well: higher order pages, such as a 2MB hugepage, or a 8K > > order-1 page. So at least in MM-speak it should be OK to call them > > 'pages'. > > > > But your call! > > How about this? > > SUMMARY (page allocator) > ======================== > Total allocation requests : 9,015 [ 37,200 Kbytes ] (A) > Total free requests : 8,093 [ 33,176 Kbytes ] (B) > > Total alloc+freed requests : 7,985 [ 32,732 Kbytes ] (C) > Total alloc-only requests : 1,030 [ 4,468 Kbytes ] (D) > Total free-only requests : 108 [ 444 Kbytes ] (E) > > Total allocation failure : 0 [ 0 Kbytes ]
s/failure/failures s/Kbytes/KB I'd leave a bit more space for the numbers, for up into billions of requests and terabytes of data. Other than that, sounds good to me! Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/