On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:57:42PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Sure, I won't argue if we use the new macros instead. But we already have
> check_insn/user_insn, why not use them?
It certainly is worth a try.
> to me check_insn(ALTERNATIVE_2(...)) looks better. Except we need the
> clobber. It is not easy to read the code like this, imo it would be better
> to avoid copy-and-paste and use the helpers we already have. Just we need
> to improve them.
Yeah, I can't say I'm crazy about those check_insn macros either but
certainly worth a try. Apparently they're the way to go in the fpu code
so let's try to use them...
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
