From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> I got the following trace with current net-next kernel :
[14723.885290] WARNING: CPU: 26 PID: 22658 at kernel/sched/core.c:7285 __might_sleep+0x89/0xa0() [14723.885325] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at [<ffffffff810e8734>] prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x34/0xa0 [14723.885355] CPU: 26 PID: 22658 Comm: netserver Not tainted 4.0.0-dbg-DEV #1379 [14723.885359] ffffffff81a223a8 ffff881fae9e7ca8 ffffffff81650b5d 0000000000000001 [14723.885364] ffff881fae9e7cf8 ffff881fae9e7ce8 ffffffff810a72e7 0000000000000000 [14723.885367] ffffffff81a57620 000000000000093a 0000000000000000 ffff881fae9e7e64 [14723.885371] Call Trace: [14723.885377] [<ffffffff81650b5d>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65 [14723.885382] [<ffffffff810a72e7>] warn_slowpath_common+0x97/0xe0 [14723.885386] [<ffffffff810a73e6>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50 [14723.885390] [<ffffffff810f4c5d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10d/0x1d0 [14723.885393] [<ffffffff810e8734>] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x34/0xa0 [14723.885396] [<ffffffff810e8734>] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x34/0xa0 [14723.885399] [<ffffffff810ccdc9>] __might_sleep+0x89/0xa0 [14723.885403] [<ffffffff81581846>] lock_sock_nested+0x36/0xb0 [14723.885406] [<ffffffff815829a3>] ? release_sock+0x173/0x1c0 [14723.885411] [<ffffffff815ea1f7>] inet_csk_accept+0x157/0x2a0 [14723.885415] [<ffffffff810e8900>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0xc0/0xc0 [14723.885419] [<ffffffff8161b96d>] inet_accept+0x2d/0x150 [14723.885424] [<ffffffff8157db6f>] SYSC_accept4+0xff/0x210 [14723.885428] [<ffffffff8165a451>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x44 [14723.885431] [<ffffffff810f4c5d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10d/0x1d0 [14723.885437] [<ffffffff81369c0e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [14723.885441] [<ffffffff8157ef40>] SyS_accept+0x10/0x20 [14723.885444] [<ffffffff81659872>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17 [14723.885447] ---[ end trace ff74cd83355b1873 ]--- In commit 26cabd31259ba43f68026ce3f62b78094124333f Peter added a sched_annotate_sleep() in sk_wait_event() Is the following patch needed as well ? Alternative would be to use sk_wait_event() from inet_csk_wait_for_connect() Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> --- net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c index 14d02ea905b6..3e44b9b0b78e 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ static int inet_csk_wait_for_connect(struct sock *sk, long timeo) release_sock(sk); if (reqsk_queue_empty(&icsk->icsk_accept_queue)) timeo = schedule_timeout(timeo); + sched_annotate_sleep(); lock_sock(sk); err = 0; if (!reqsk_queue_empty(&icsk->icsk_accept_queue)) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
