On 03/19/2015 12:08 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:46:11PM +0000, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Some architectures have some cpus which does not support idle states.
Let the underlying low level code to return -ENOSYS when it is not
possible to set an idle state.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg55550.html
-ENXIO ?
Ack, it makes more sense.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c
index 1c94b88..0682ed0 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c
@@ -17,11 +17,14 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <asm/cpuidle.h>
#include "dt_idle_states.h"
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device, *cpuidle_arm_dev);
+
/*
* arm_enter_idle_state - Programs CPU to enter the specified state
*
@@ -94,6 +97,7 @@ static int __init arm_idle_init(void)
{
int cpu, ret;
struct cpuidle_driver *drv = &arm_idle_driver;
+ struct cpuidle_device *dev;
/*
* Initialize idle states data, starting at index 1.
@@ -105,18 +109,55 @@ static int __init arm_idle_init(void)
if (ret <= 0)
return ret ? : -ENODEV;
+ ret = cpuidle_register_driver(drv);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("Failed to register cpuidle driver\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
/*
* Call arch CPU operations in order to initialize
* idle states suspend back-end specific data
*/
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
ret = arm_cpuidle_init(cpu);
+
+ /* This cpu does not support any idle states */
+ if (ret == -ENOSYS)
+ continue;
+
if (ret) {
pr_err("CPU %d failed to init idle CPU ops\n", cpu);
- return ret;
+ goto out_fail;
+ }
+
+ dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dev) {
+ pr_err("Failed to allocate cpuidle device\n");
+ goto out_fail;
+ }
+
+ dev->cpu = cpu;
+ per_cpu(cpuidle_arm_dev, cpu) = dev;
+
+ ret = cpuidle_register_device(dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("Failed to register cpuidle device for CPU %d\n",
+ cpu);
+ kfree(dev);
+ goto out_fail;
}
}
+out:
+ return ret;
return 0;
- return cpuidle_register(drv, NULL);
+out_fail:
+ for (cpu--; cpu <= 0; cpu--) {
This loop is wrong.
Why is it wrong ? We have to initialize at cpu - 1 to unregister the
previous registered cpu, not the current one, no ?
+ dev = per_cpu(cpuidle_arm_dev, cpu);
+ cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
+ kfree(dev);
+ }
+ cpuidle_unregister_driver(drv);
+ goto out;
You just:
return ret;
little point in jumping around to just return.
Ok.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
