On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 06:26:17PM +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> > On 17 March 2015 at 18:19 Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org> wrote:

> > Well, another thing to do if there's no dependencies is to just send
> > each patch separately - there's no real relationship between the
> > patches.  This also avoids the issue.

> Such trivial updates are generally applied by David or Greg
> after receiving some ack. That's the reason for the patchset :)

It's pretty disappointing if that's the case, though it might be
something connected with the submission style - for most of the kernel
patches would normally be handled directly by the maintainer.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to