Hi Viet, On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 01:15:14AM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > From: VIET NGA DAO <[email protected]> > > This patch introduces a properly-replaceable spi_nor callback that does > flash specific lock and unlock. The existing code for spi_nor_lock and > spi_nor_unlock is moved into their own functions which are stm_lock and > stm_unlock.
I'm curious; is this a complete ripoff of my code [1]? You haven't credited my authorship at all. That's a big no-no. Typically you keep the 'From:' and Signed-off-by of the original author if you're going to modify/redistribute it. (Admittedly, I didn't provide the S-o-b on my informal patch.) Anyway, that's all fine this time, but please avoid doing this in the future; I can fix up the authorship, etc., and apply it, if it gets an Ack/Tested-by from one or more reviewers (e.g., you). BTW, I hope you at least tested this, right? Brian [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-March/058301.html > Signed-off-by: VIET NGA DAO <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 56 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > index b6a5a0c..43bb552 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > @@ -369,17 +369,13 @@ erase_err: > return ret; > } > > -static int spi_nor_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > +static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > { > - struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); > + struct mtd_info *mtd = nor->mtd; > uint32_t offset = ofs; > uint8_t status_old, status_new; > int ret = 0; > > - ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - > status_old = read_sr(nor); > > if (offset < mtd->size - (mtd->size / 2)) > @@ -402,26 +398,18 @@ static int spi_nor_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t > ofs, uint64_t len) > (status_old & (SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0))) { > write_enable(nor); > ret = write_sr(nor, status_new); > - if (ret) > - goto err; > } > > -err: > - spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); > return ret; > } > > -static int spi_nor_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > +static int stm_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > { > - struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); > + struct mtd_info *mtd = nor->mtd; > uint32_t offset = ofs; > uint8_t status_old, status_new; > int ret = 0; > > - ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_UNLOCK); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - > status_old = read_sr(nor); > > if (offset+len > mtd->size - (mtd->size / 64)) > @@ -444,15 +432,41 @@ static int spi_nor_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t > ofs, uint64_t len) > (status_old & (SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0))) { > write_enable(nor); > ret = write_sr(nor, status_new); > - if (ret) > - goto err; > } > > -err: > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int spi_nor_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > +{ > + struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); > + int ret; > + > + ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = nor->flash_lock(nor, ofs, len); > + > spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_UNLOCK); > return ret; > } > > +static int spi_nor_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) > +{ > + struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd); > + int ret; > + > + ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_UNLOCK); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = nor->flash_unlock(nor, ofs, len); > + > + spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK); > + return ret; > +} > + > /* Used when the "_ext_id" is two bytes at most */ > #define INFO(_jedec_id, _ext_id, _sector_size, _n_sectors, _flags) \ > ((kernel_ulong_t)&(struct flash_info) { \ > @@ -1045,6 +1059,10 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char > *name, enum read_mode mode) > > /* nor protection support for STmicro chips */ > if (JEDEC_MFR(info) == CFI_MFR_ST) { > + nor->flash_lock = stm_lock; > + nor->flash_unlock = stm_unlock; > + } > + if (nor->flash_lock && nor->flash_unlock) { > mtd->_lock = spi_nor_lock; > mtd->_unlock = spi_nor_unlock; > } > diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h > index 4720b86..e4e73d5 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h > +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h > @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ enum spi_nor_option_flags { > * @write: [DRIVER-SPECIFIC] write data to the SPI NOR > * @erase: [DRIVER-SPECIFIC] erase a sector of the SPI NOR > * at the offset @offs > + * @lock: [FLASH-SPECIFIC] lock a region of the SPI NOR > + * @unlock: [FLASH-SPECIFIC] unlock a region of the SPI NOR > * @priv: the private data > */ > struct spi_nor { > @@ -188,6 +190,8 @@ struct spi_nor { > void (*write)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t to, > size_t len, size_t *retlen, const u_char *write_buf); > int (*erase)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t offs); > + int (*flash_lock)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len); > + int (*flash_unlock)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len); > > void *priv; > }; > -- > 1.7.11.GIT > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
