On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 11:55 +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote:
> 
> And by the way, while revisiting the series I've noticed that though the patch
> 4/4 basically reverts [1], it leaves
> 
>   #define MPIC_GREG_GLOBAL_CONF_1             0x00030
> 
> in arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpic.h untouched. That define also loses its uses
> after applying the patch. Compare the following hunk in today's patch w/ the 
> one
> you committed:
> 
>   @@ -33,11 +33,6 @@
>    #define            MPIC_GREG_GCONF_NO_BIAS                 0x10000000
>    #define            MPIC_GREG_GCONF_BASE_MASK               0x000fffff
>    #define            MPIC_GREG_GCONF_MCK                     0x08000000
>   -#define MPIC_GREG_GLOBAL_CONF_1            0x00030
>   -#define            MPIC_GREG_GLOBAL_CONF_1_SIE             0x08000000
>   -#define            MPIC_GREG_GLOBAL_CONF_1_CLK_RATIO_MASK  0x70000000
>   -#define            MPIC_GREG_GLOBAL_CONF_1_CLK_RATIO(r)    \
>   -                   (((r) << 28) & MPIC_GREG_GLOBAL_CONF_1_CLK_RATIO_MASK)
>    #define MPIC_GREG_VENDOR_0         0x00040
>    #define MPIC_GREG_VENDOR_1         0x00050
>    #define MPIC_GREG_VENDOR_2         0x00060
> 
> So the question is, should #define MPIC_GREG_GLOBAL_CONF_1 have been also
> removed, or could be left as is?
> 
> [1] https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2006-June/023867.html


OK, thanks for the thoroughness.

With #defines like that it's never clear if they should be removed or not. On
the one hand it's not used, so it should be removed. But, it can be useful to
keep the #defines there as documentation.

So I'm 50/50 on it. If you send me a patch to remove it I'll merge it, unless
someone else objects.

cheers


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to