On 03/21/15 at 09:10pm, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Taesoo Kim <tsgat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Althouhg mkfs.cifs in userspace performs a bit of sanitization
> > (e.g., forcing one user option), current implementation is not
> > robust. Other options such as iocharset and domainanme are similary
> > vulnerable.
> >
> 
> I assume you mean mount.cifs?  :-) Anyways, good catch.

Right. FYI, I've tried mangling password field (e.g., pass=a,user=A
&c); Skimming through the code (just a few minutes), there are a few
potential places that don't sanitize its string, unlike passwd. But
don't have much time to play with for now :)

Thanks,
Taesoo
 
> -- 
> Peace and Blessings,
> -Scott.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to