On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 06:43:40PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > But not here. This is not an optimization this is the *error path*. > What I'm saying is: > "No compiler nor CPU, even if 99% of the time this branch is taken > I still consider it cold. Because it is the error case and > I do not care for it"
GCC already understands that "if (foo) goto FORWARD_LABEL" should be predicted unlikely by default. All you're doing is cluttering the source code. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
