On Tue 24-03-15 16:47:25, Taesoo Kim wrote:
> Upon successful rename(), update ctime and mtime of new_dir
> as posix specifies.
>
> Signed-off-by: Taesoo Kim <tsgat...@gmail.com>
Thanks for spotting the problem! But you apparently didn't test the patch
because it doesn't fix the problem - you've placed the timestamp update
into a wrong branch. Please test the patches before you send them.
I've fixed the problem together with similar issues during file creation,
link, etc.
Honza
> ---
> fs/udf/namei.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/udf/namei.c b/fs/udf/namei.c
> index 33b246b..eca1955 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/namei.c
> @@ -1144,6 +1144,8 @@ static int udf_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct
> dentry *old_dentry,
> inode_dec_link_count(new_inode);
> else {
> inc_nlink(new_dir);
> + new_dir->i_ctime = new_dir->i_mtime
> + = current_fs_time(new_dir->i_sb);
> mark_inode_dirty(new_dir);
> }
> }
> --
> 2.3.3
>
--
Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
