On Mon, 06 Apr 2015 18:19:19 +0200 Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> But the main reason I added that remark was that recently I ran into a > few patches where I made annoying mistakes in parsing changes to > Makefiles. Doing so I wasted my own and other peoples time. So I decided > to be rather verbose when Makefiles are involved. Just so that people > can: > - mock me for not getting basic stuff right; I hope you don't think I was mocking you. I wasn't. > - stop paying attention to the rest of my remarks, because chances are I > didn't understand the patch in question correctly. I wouldn't put your comments up as useless. I could imagine people going through and cleaning up header includes, as long as not much impact is made. The only issue I can think of that including an unneeded header file does is to make the compile slightly longer. It's not a major need to do, but it may be done. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
