2015-04-07 15:52 GMT+06:00 Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>: > > It would be nice to test it via a well placed printk() and check that > before the patch the message doesn't go to the serial console and > after the patch the message indeed arrives on the early serial console > - or something like that.
I have tested this patch when i wrote it and early_printk does not print anything before the parse_early_param. But i don't know how to show this in code in a correct way. Maybe we should to give back early_printk call which i removed in the previous patch (https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=91d8f0416f3989e248d3a3d3efb821eda10a85d2)? Any one another question about this. I submited patch only for head64.c and it does not affect kernel for i386, because i'm not sure where is the best place to setup earlyprintk in the head32.c. I thought to put it in the start of i386_start_kernel(void) (from head32.c) but not sure about it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
