On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 02:22:03 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Friday, April 03, 2015 03:19:53 PM Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > From: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
> > 
> > I keep seeing
> > 
> >   drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c: In function ‘intel_pstate_init’:
> >   drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:1187:26: warning: initialization from 
> > incompatible pointer type
> >     struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
> > 
> > when doing randconfig builds.
> > 
> > This is caused by the fact that when !CONFIG_SMP, asm/processor.h
> > defines cpu_info to boot_cpu_data and the local variable
> > 
> >   struct cpu_defaults *cpu_info
> > 
> > overshadows it leading to this unfortunate assignment in the
> > preprocessed source:
> > 
> >  struct cpu_defaults *boot_cpu_data;
> >  struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
> > 
> > Rename the local variable and use static_cpu_has_safe() which alleviates
> > the need for defining a local cpuinfo_x86 pointer.
> 
> Kristen, any comments here?

Seems fine to me.

Acked-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <[email protected]>

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <[email protected]>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 12 ++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > index 872c5772c5d3..0b883f131a73 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> >  #include <asm/div64.h>
> >  #include <asm/msr.h>
> >  #include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
> > +#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> >  
> >  #define BYT_RATIOS         0x66a
> >  #define BYT_VIDS           0x66b
> > @@ -1183,8 +1184,7 @@ static int __init intel_pstate_init(void)
> >  {
> >     int cpu, rc = 0;
> >     const struct x86_cpu_id *id;
> > -   struct cpu_defaults *cpu_info;
> > -   struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
> > +   struct cpu_defaults *cpu_def;
> >  
> >     if (no_load)
> >             return -ENODEV;
> > @@ -1200,10 +1200,10 @@ static int __init intel_pstate_init(void)
> >     if (intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists())
> >             return -ENODEV;
> >  
> > -   cpu_info = (struct cpu_defaults *)id->driver_data;
> > +   cpu_def = (struct cpu_defaults *)id->driver_data;
> >  
> > -   copy_pid_params(&cpu_info->pid_policy);
> > -   copy_cpu_funcs(&cpu_info->funcs);
> > +   copy_pid_params(&cpu_def->pid_policy);
> > +   copy_cpu_funcs(&cpu_def->funcs);
> >  
> >     if (intel_pstate_msrs_not_valid())
> >             return -ENODEV;
> > @@ -1214,7 +1214,7 @@ static int __init intel_pstate_init(void)
> >     if (!all_cpu_data)
> >             return -ENOMEM;
> >  
> > -   if (cpu_has(c,X86_FEATURE_HWP) && !no_hwp)
> > +   if (static_cpu_has_safe(X86_FEATURE_HWP) && !no_hwp)
> >             intel_pstate_hwp_enable();
> >  
> >     if (!hwp_active && hwp_only)
> > 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to