On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:26:45PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:17:55AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > > nohz_full is only useful with isolcpus also set, since otherwise the > > scheduler has to run periodically to try to determine whether to steal > > work from other cores. > > > > Accordingly, when booting with nohz_full=xxx on the command line, we > > should act as if isolcpus=xxx was also set, and set (or extend) the > > isolcpus set to include the nohz_full cpus. > > > > Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> > > No need to put my ack, since I'll add my Signed-off-by when I apply the > patches. > Note this won't go through this merge window though as we are in the middle of > it already. > > Peter, are you ok with these two patches?
Yeah, Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
