On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:57:37PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > > I've applied his patch, then the following:
Thanks. > > modpost: handle -ffunction-sections > > 52dc0595d540 introduced OTHER_TEXT_SECTIONS for identifying what > sections could validly have __ex_table entries. Unfortunately, it > wasn't tested with -ffunction-sections, which some architectures > use. > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang...@intel.com> > Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasno...@oracle.com> > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au> > > diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c > index cbd53e08769d..22dbc604cdb9 100644 > --- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c > +++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c > @@ -876,7 +876,7 @@ static void check_section(const char *modname, struct > elf_info *elf, > #define TEXT_SECTIONS ".text", ".text.unlikely", ".sched.text", \ > ".kprobes.text" > #define OTHER_TEXT_SECTIONS ".ref.text", ".head.text", ".spinlock.text", \ > - ".fixup", ".entry.text" > + ".fixup", ".entry.text", ".exception.text", ".text.*" > Is there a reason we're not adding ".text.*" to TEXT_SECTIONS as opposed to OTHER_TEXT_SECTIONS? AFAIU, we'll not run the other modpost mismatch checks when the kernel is compiled with -ffunction-sections otherwise. I'll send a tentative fix for the divide-by-zero error shortly, sorry about the mess. Quentin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
