----- Original Message ----- > On 22 April 2015 at 21:43, Mathieu Desnoyers > <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 11:06 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > >> > [ Not in this patch: tests (Pranith Kumar has a patch for this), man > >> > page. > >> > ] > >> > >> Actually, we had discussed that for new syscalls, the changelog _would_ > >> be the manpage -- at least included in it. > > > > Do you want the formatted content, or just the text ? Putting > > manpage formatting in the changelog seems a bit odd. > > > Plain text works for me. Just divide it up into the usuual man-pages > sections (see man-pages(7), and I'll take care of the rest).
OK. Should I do the writeup as a man(2) from the POV of a glibc user ? It's a bit different when we get to return values and error codes if we document kernel<->glibc or glibc<->user. Moreover, how can we get this into glibc ? Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
