On Saturday 25 April 2015 11:37:51 Tejun Heo wrote: > I thought more about it and it's weird to have ATA_LFLAG_CHANGED and > last_lpm_change timestamp in libata core side and then open-code the > actual logic in ahci. How about implementing a generic helper, say, > bool sata_lpm_ignore_phy_events(link) in libata core and use it in > specific drivers? It can test both the current lpm_policy and the > timeout (preferably a separate patch to introduce the function and > factor out lpm policy testing).
I agree. I'm now going to send the revised patches, thanks for all the suggestions. Gabriele -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
