Anisse Astier <ani...@astier.eu> writes:
> +       If unsure, say N.
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 05fcec9..c71440a 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -803,6 +803,11 @@ static bool free_pages_prepare(struct page *page, 
> unsigned int order)
>               debug_check_no_obj_freed(page_address(page),
>                                          PAGE_SIZE << order);
>       }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SANITIZE_FREED_PAGES
> +     zero_pages(page, order);
> +#endif

And not removing the clear on __GFP_ZERO by remembering that?

That means all clears would be done twice. 

That patch is far too simple. Clearing is commonly the most
expensive kernel operation.

-Andi

-- 
a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to