On Thursday 30 April 2015 10:06 AM, Preeti Murthy wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Shreyas B Prabhu > <shre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Wednesday 29 April 2015 10:38 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: >>>> I am not sure if its worth the effort now. It doesn't look like any >>>> other trace point apart from the above use case will benefit from it. >>>> Only smbus_write and smbus_reply seem to come close. But even they need >>>> separate TP_fast_assign. >>> >>> It shouldn't be a problem to implement. But I'm currently cleaning up >>> those files, and any changes will cause nasty conflicts. >>> >>> Lets do this. Push the current changes as is, and when I get around to >>> adding a DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT_CONDITION(), we can modify that code to use >>> it. >>> >> Okay, sure. > > Looks good then. > > Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy <pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks a lot! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
