On 04/30/2015 07:49 AM, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote: > @@ -1640,6 +1640,7 @@ static void __mcheck_cpu_init_vendor(struct cpuinfo_x86 > *c) > case X86_VENDOR_AMD: > mce_amd_feature_init(c); > mce_flags.overflow_recov = cpuid_ebx(0x80000007) & 0x1; > + mce_flags.succor = (cpuid_ebx(0x80000007) & 0x2) ? 1 : 0; > break; > default: > break;
Is there a reason to add the cpuid detection like this instead of adding an X86_FEATURE_ for it and using cpu_has() and friends? Doing that would also let you see the bit in /proc/cpuinfo. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
