On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:05 PM, David Miller <da...@redhat.com> wrote: > From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarz...@free.fr> > Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:06:13 +0100 > >> David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> writes: >> >>> From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarz...@free.fr> >>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:48:49 +0100 >>> >>>> Linus has submitted the patch [1]. I'll be watching carefully until -rc4 >>>> that >>>> this is applied. If it's not, I'll reping you to apply this revert. Until >>>> then, >>>> you can forget about it, I'll do the follow-up. >>>> >>>> Does that plan sound good to you ? >>> >>> It sounds good to me. >> >> Hi David, >> >> Unfortunately Linus's patch didn't make it upstream. Therefore I'll ask you >> to >> apply the revert, which is reminded in [1]. > > Revert applied, thanks.
Since the required patch fixing the actual problem is now upstream, can we revert the revert? Caused by response time in maintainers, so a people problem, not a technical one, sadly :/ Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
