On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 03:54:43PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > The "reflect" variable that had to be added to cpuidle_idle_call() to fix a > regression during the 4.0 cycle has bothered me a bit since then and guess > what? It is not necessary. > > After the last regression fix related to tick_broadcast_exit() I realized > that it should be possible to eliminate this variable by splitting > cpuidle_idle_call() into smaller routines and reordering the code in > question which is done by this patch series. > > It also gets rid of one more redundant check while at it.
Ooh nice! Yes that thing bothered me too. Once you fix that one weird opening bracket: Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
