On Monday, May 04, 2015 04:25:05 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 03:54:43PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The "reflect" variable that had to be added to cpuidle_idle_call() to fix a > > regression during the 4.0 cycle has bothered me a bit since then and guess > > what? It is not necessary. > > > > After the last regression fix related to tick_broadcast_exit() I realized > > that it should be possible to eliminate this variable by splitting > > cpuidle_idle_call() into smaller routines and reordering the code in > > question which is done by this patch series. > > > > It also gets rid of one more redundant check while at it. > > > Ooh nice! Yes that thing bothered me too. > > Once you fix that one weird opening bracket: > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Fixed and queued up as 4.2 material, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
