This function name is a misnomer now that we've split out all the
other users from it. Rename it accordingly: it's used to save
the FPU state of (ptrace-)stopped child tasks.

Add debugging check to double check this intended usage: that this
function is only called for non-current, stopped child tasks.

Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua...@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/i387.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
index 95079026c386..909d10d2fb70 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
@@ -283,27 +283,30 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpstate_alloc_init);
  * value at reset if we support XMM instructions and then
  * remember the current task has used the FPU.
  */
-static int init_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
+static int fpu__unlazy_stopped(struct task_struct *child)
 {
        int ret;
 
-       if (tsk_used_math(tsk)) {
-               if (cpu_has_fpu && tsk == current)
-                       fpu__save(tsk);
-               task_disable_lazy_fpu_restore(tsk);
+       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(child == current))
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       if (tsk_used_math(child)) {
+               if (cpu_has_fpu && child == current)
+                       fpu__save(child);
+               task_disable_lazy_fpu_restore(child);
                return 0;
        }
 
        /*
         * Memory allocation at the first usage of the FPU and other state.
         */
-       ret = fpu_alloc(&tsk->thread.fpu);
+       ret = fpu_alloc(&child->thread.fpu);
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
-       fpu_finit(&tsk->thread.fpu);
+       fpu_finit(&child->thread.fpu);
 
-       set_stopped_child_used_math(tsk);
+       set_stopped_child_used_math(child);
        return 0;
 }
 
@@ -331,7 +334,7 @@ int xfpregs_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct 
user_regset *regset,
        if (!cpu_has_fxsr)
                return -ENODEV;
 
-       ret = init_fpu(target);
+       ret = fpu__unlazy_stopped(target);
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
@@ -350,7 +353,7 @@ int xfpregs_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct 
user_regset *regset,
        if (!cpu_has_fxsr)
                return -ENODEV;
 
-       ret = init_fpu(target);
+       ret = fpu__unlazy_stopped(target);
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
@@ -384,7 +387,7 @@ int xstateregs_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct 
user_regset *regset,
        if (!cpu_has_xsave)
                return -ENODEV;
 
-       ret = init_fpu(target);
+       ret = fpu__unlazy_stopped(target);
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
@@ -414,7 +417,7 @@ int xstateregs_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct 
user_regset *regset,
        if (!cpu_has_xsave)
                return -ENODEV;
 
-       ret = init_fpu(target);
+       ret = fpu__unlazy_stopped(target);
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
@@ -577,7 +580,7 @@ int fpregs_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct 
user_regset *regset,
        struct user_i387_ia32_struct env;
        int ret;
 
-       ret = init_fpu(target);
+       ret = fpu__unlazy_stopped(target);
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
@@ -608,7 +611,7 @@ int fpregs_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct 
user_regset *regset,
        struct user_i387_ia32_struct env;
        int ret;
 
-       ret = init_fpu(target);
+       ret = fpu__unlazy_stopped(target);
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to