On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:31:32PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> Well, the comment kinda says it already, but I will try to clarify it.
>
> /*
> * We have start:end spanning across an MTRR.
> * We split the region into either
> * - start_state:1
> * (start:mtrr_end) (mtrr_end:end)
> * - end_state:1 or inclusive:1
> * (start:mtrr_start) (mtrr_start:end)
What I mean is this:
* - start_state:1
* (start:mtrr_end) (mtrr_end:end)
* - end_state:1
* (start:mtrr_start) (mtrr_start:end)
* - inclusive:1
* (start:mtrr_start) (mtrr_start:mtrr_end) (mtrr_end:end)
*
* depending on kind of overlap.
*
* Return the type of the first region and a pointer to the start
* of next region so that caller will be advised to lookup again
* after having adjusted start and end.
*
* Note: This way we handle multiple overlaps as well.
*/
We add comments so that people can read them and can quickly understand
what the function does. Not to make them parse it and wonder why
inclusive:1 is listed together with end_state:1 which returns two
intervals.
Note that I changed the text to talk about the *next* region and not
about the *second* region, to make it even more clear.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
