On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 17:26 +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > On 05/11/2015 04:42 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 16:05 +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > >> Use one return statement instead of two to simplify the code. > >> Both are returning the same value. > > > > trivia and FYI: > > But still correct right?
Yes. > > I think there are about 100 of these in kernel tree > > and I'm not going to submit patches. > > > > $ grep-2.5.4 -rP --include=*.[ch] -n "^([\t]+)\treturn[ > > \t]+([A-Za-z0-9\_\>\(\)\.\>\[\]\-]+);\n(\1}\n)?\1return[ \t]+\2;" * | \ > > grep -P "^[\w\/\.]+:\d+:" > > Are you suggesting that someone else should send patches for it? I get enough grief for doing style oriented patches, so if someone else wants to, sure. > I expect that this is something what Julia can check with coccinelle > and can be added to scripts folder. Maybe true. A coccinelle script might be rather more complicated than the simpler grep above, but perhaps the script could be a bit more complete as it could likely look at more code indentation styles. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
