On 05/11/2015 05:39 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 17:26 +0200, Michal Simek wrote: >> On 05/11/2015 04:42 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>> On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 16:05 +0200, Michal Simek wrote: >>>> Use one return statement instead of two to simplify the code. >>>> Both are returning the same value. >>> >>> trivia and FYI: >> >> But still correct right? > > Yes.
Does this mean that you have added me your ACK? >>> I think there are about 100 of these in kernel tree >>> and I'm not going to submit patches. >>> >>> $ grep-2.5.4 -rP --include=*.[ch] -n "^([\t]+)\treturn[ >>> \t]+([A-Za-z0-9\_\>\(\)\.\>\[\]\-]+);\n(\1}\n)?\1return[ \t]+\2;" * | \ >>> grep -P "^[\w\/\.]+:\d+:" >> >> Are you suggesting that someone else should send patches for it? > > I get enough grief for doing style oriented patches, > so if someone else wants to, sure. yep - the only reason I have submitted this was that this is the diff in the xilinx tree compare to mainline and I don't want to simple revert it because it is correct. >> I expect that this is something what Julia can check with coccinelle >> and can be added to scripts folder. > > Maybe true. > > A coccinelle script might be rather more complicated > than the simpler grep above, but perhaps the script > could be a bit more complete as it could likely look > at more code indentation styles. Julia: Any comment? Thanks, Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/