On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:49:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Shobhit Kumar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > In case we unload and load a driver module again that is registering a >> > lookup table, without this it will result in multiple entries. Provide >> > an option to remove the lookup table on driver unload >> > >> > v2: Ccing maintainers >> > >> > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]> >> > Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> >> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]> >> > Cc: Thierry Reding <[email protected]> >> > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]> >> > Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <[email protected]> >> >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> > > I think the gpio/pwm and mfd parts would all need to go in through the > same tree. i915 parts are decoupled. I guess I could do a branch with just > those patches, tag it and then send a pull request to all 3 subsystems > once it's reviewed. Would that be ok?
That's an immutable branch I guess, and yeah I think it's OK. I usually only pull these in if/when there are conflicts in -next. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
