On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:39:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:20:28AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:13:00PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > So, that was my original suggestion too but people were complaining that > > > this wasn't a generally supported feature and requires specific support > > > of some kind in the bus (which nobody posted a patch for). > > > I don't understand the complaint, it's a very "generally supported > > feature" and has been there for a very long time for any bus that wants > > to use it. > > So it's not something that just works for all buses and someone would > need to write a patch (hint, hint - that's one of the big blockers > here)? It is a bit surprising to me that this would be something that > the buses would need to cope with individually since for most things the > matching mechanics are taken care of in the driver core and we're > explicitly overriding them here.
It should "just work" for all busses, but if you want to add a "new_id" sysfs file, you need to add the logic for that to your bus. It's the bind/unbind files in the driver directories. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
