On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmo...@redhat.com> wrote: > Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com> writes: > >> @@ -919,10 +920,31 @@ static inline const char *e820_type_to_string(int >> e820_type) >> case E820_NVS: return "ACPI Non-volatile Storage"; >> case E820_UNUSABLE: return "Unusable memory"; >> case E820_PRAM: return "Persistent RAM"; >> + case E820_PMEM: return "Persistent I/O Memory"; > > Minor nit, but nobody refers to this stuff as persistent I/O memory. > I've heard it referred to as persistent memory or storage class memory. > In the end, I doubt it matters.
Had we not polluted the waters with E820_PRAM I would have chosen "Persistent Memory", but as we now need to support both I'd assume they need different names. > Acked-by: Jeff Moyer <jmo...@redhat.com> Thanks Jeff. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
