On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 06:17:45PM +0300, grygorii.stras...@linaro.org wrote: > On 05/18/2015 06:08 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > How about instead of > > > > GPIOs 160-191, platform/4805d000.gpio, gpio: > > gpio-171 ((null) ) in hi IRQ209 > > > > you do something like: > > > > GPIOs 160-191, platform/4805d000.gpio, gpio: > > gpio-171 (<irq-only> ) in hi IRQ-209 > > In general agree, but i propose to do it as > GPIOs 160-191, platform/4805d000.gpio, gpio: > gpio-171 ((null) ) in hi IRQ-209 <irq-only> I have no strong opinion on whether to use the name-field here or not. Using the name-field rather than adding a new one could perhaps be less confusing to current parsers. > My intention is - this interface could be considered as more or less > stable, so it is better to add additional information at the end of > each line to avoid potential breakage of User space SW (test/debug > scripts). But if the interface is considered stable (and some people do) you would not be able to add anything here. This *is* a real issue, but I'll defer this one to Linus and Alexandre. Perhaps we should just leave things as they are. Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
