On Monday, May 18, 2015 04:49:43 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sat, 16 May 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > > > Since idle_should_freeze() is defined to always return 'false' > > for CONFIG_SUSPEND unset, all of the code depending on it in > > cpuidle_idle_call() is not necessary in that case. > > > > Make that code depend on CONFIG_SUSPEND too to avoid building it > > when it is not going to be used. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > ACK for the tick part.
Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/