On 2015-05-21 10:26, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:38:21AM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote: >> Select ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M in defconfigs of the converted ARMv7-M >> platforms. > I assume this relates to your series that introduces this symbol. Should > the defconfig update happen before? (Or what is the result if > CONFIG_ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M=y is missing in the defconfig while the symbol > already exists?) Maybe this should be squashed into the commit in > question?
The Kconfig system defaults to versatile then, it tried yesterday and I think it and it compiled fine actually. However, it is of course not what the user wants. The defconfigs of the new machines are currently in arm-soc next/defconfig. While testing, I just merged the defconfig branch into the soc branch, but then splitted the patch in two independent patches. Arnd, what do you think? -- Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
