On 5/21/2015 6:14 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 20 May 2015 06:53 AM, Ray Jui wrote:
>> Add DT binding document for Broadcom Cygnus PCIe PHY driver
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <r...@broadcom.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Arun Parameswaran <apara...@broadcom.com>
>> Reviewed-by: JD (Jiandong) Zheng <jdzh...@broadcom.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <sbran...@broadcom.com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/phy/brcm,cygnus-pcie-phy.txt | 31
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/brcm,cygnus-pcie-phy.txt
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/brcm,cygnus-pcie-phy.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/brcm,cygnus-pcie-phy.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..36745ee
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/brcm,cygnus-pcie-phy.txt
>
> brcm-cygnus-pcie-phy.txt?
>> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
>> +Broadcom Cygnus PCIe PHY
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: Must be "brcm,cygnus-pcie-phy"
>> +- reg: base address and length of the CRMU block
>> +- #phy-cells: must be <2>
>> +The first cell is the PHY ID:
>> +0 - PCIe RC 0
>> +1 - PCIe RC 1
>> +The second cell is the internal PHY address
>> +
>> +Example:
>> + phy: phy@0301d0a0 {
>> + compatible = "brcm,cygnus-pcie-phy";
>> + reg = <0x0301d0a0 0x14>;
>> + #phy-cells = <2>;
>> + };
>
> IMHO these nodes should be child nodes of the mdio node. Are they
> modelled that way?
>
> Thanks
> Kishon
Currently they are not. But you are right. It makes more sense for the
PHY nodes to be declared under the MDIO bus node. I will make that change.
Thanks,
Ray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
