From: Linuxppc-dev Christophe Leroy
> Sent: 19 May 2015 16:19
...
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/checksum.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/checksum.h
> index 5e43d2d..e8d9ef4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/checksum.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/checksum.h
> @@ -130,6 +130,22 @@ static inline __sum16 csum_tcpudp_magic(__be32 saddr,
> __be32 daddr,
> return csum_fold(csum_tcpudp_nofold(saddr, daddr, len, proto, sum));
> }
>
> +#define HAVE_ARCH_CSUM_ADD
> +static inline __wsum csum_add(__wsum csum, __wsum addend)
> +{
> +#ifdef __powerpc64__
> + u64 res = (__force u64)csum;
> +
> + res += (__force u64)addend;
> + return (__force __wsum)((u32)res + (res >> 32));
> +#else
> + asm("addc %0,%0,%1;"
> + "addze %0,%0;"
> + : "+r" (csum) : "r" (addend));
> + return csum;
> +#endif
I'd have thought it better to test for the cpu type where you want the
'asm' variant, and then fall back on the C version for all others.
I know (well suspect) there are only two cases here.
I'd also have thought that the 64bit C version above would be generally 'good'.
David
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i
