So this "fix" is wrong. But you know, even if it was correct... IMO, the fixes like this can only make sense as a "while at it" part of the meaningful change.
On 05/23, Shailendra Verma wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capric...@gmail.com> > --- > kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c > index c8e0e05..46249f9 100644 > --- a/kernel/ptrace.c > +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c > @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ void __ptrace_unlink(struct task_struct *child) > > /* > * If transition to TASK_STOPPED is pending or in TASK_TRACED, kick > - * @child in the butt. Note that @resume should be used iff @child > + * @child in the butt. Note that @resume should be used if @child > * is in TASK_TRACED; otherwise, we might unduly disrupt > * TASK_KILLABLE sleeps. > */ > -- > 1.7.9.5 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
