On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 11:48 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > From: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> > > Now that we emulate a PAT table when PAT is disabled, there's no need > for those checks anymore as the PAT abstraction will handle those cases > too. > > Based on a conglomerate patch from Toshi Kani. > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
I reviewed the 1/3-3/3 patchset in your "tip-mm-2" branch, which is different from this submitted patchset 1/4-4/4. So, my review-by applies to the 3 patches in the "tip-mm-2" branch. Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <[email protected]> Thanks, -Toshi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
