On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:00:29PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> I'm wondering what people think about this naming scheme:
>
> entry_32.S # 32-bit binaries on 32-bit kernels
> entry_64.S # 64-bit binaries on 64-bit kernels
> entry_64_compat_32.S # 32-bit binaries on 64-bit kernels
>
> Another option would be:
>
> arch/x86/entry/sys_32.S
> arch/x86/entry/sys_64.S
> arch/x86/entry/sys_64_compat.S
I like this one better because entry_64_compat_32 kinda has both bitness in
there and confuses me more.
Just my 2 ยข. :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
