Call it sys if it is now only the system call entry points. Agreed with _64_compat too.
Breaking up these snarls of spaghetti assembly will be a blessing. On June 5, 2015 6:37:14 AM PDT, Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> wrote: >On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:00:29PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> I'm wondering what people think about this naming scheme: >> >> entry_32.S # 32-bit binaries on 32-bit >kernels >> entry_64.S # 64-bit binaries on 64-bit >kernels >> entry_64_compat_32.S # 32-bit binaries on 64-bit >kernels >> >> Another option would be: >> >> arch/x86/entry/sys_32.S >> arch/x86/entry/sys_64.S >> arch/x86/entry/sys_64_compat.S > >I like this one better because entry_64_compat_32 kinda has both >bitness in >there and confuses me more. > >Just my 2 ยข. :) -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
