On 8/14/05, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:01 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It > > > should be harmless. > > > > Therefore please submit them. > > Cut the crap, you know I've submitted the stuff again and again and > again along with other fixes, reports of stuff you broke you ignored > etc. So I got bored of playing your games.
* your stuff was accepted after all (and some stuff like ide-cd fixes was never splitted from the -ac patchset and submitted) * you've never provided any technical details on "the stuff I broke" Can't you get over this bullshit please? Life goes on. > > > > > [227523.229631] hda: cache flushes not supported > > > > > [227523.229932] hda:hda: recal_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady > > > > > SeekComplete Error } > > > > > [227523.230905] hda: recal_intr: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError } > > > > > [227523.230952] ide: failed opcode was: unknown > > > > > > Yep - on my "wtf" list. In some cases we send a strange command to the > > > IT8212 drive. I'm still trying to find the guilty command we send (none > > > of my drives do this), so that I can fix the ident adjustment to stop > > > it. The noise is just the command being rejected which is ok but messy > > > and wants stomping. > > > > small hint: WIN_RESTORE > > Would make sense, but I thought I had the right bits masked. Will take a WIN_RESTORE is send unconditionally (as it always was), This is not the right thing, somebody should go over all ATA/ATAPI drafts and come with the correct strategy of handling WIN_RESTORE. > look tomorrow however. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/