On 08/06/2015 at 17:06:34 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote :
> > I've contemplated applying that patch but I'm not sure it is actually a
> > good idea because those 46 drivers are using a variant of module_driver
> > which actually uses __init and __exit. After your patch it is still
> > working simply because init.h gets included that way:
> 
> Firstly, I am kind of curious why an 18 month old patch is getting
> replied to now.   That aside, this interdependence between module.h and
> init.h was reconsidered and you can see the resolution solution here:
> 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433276168-21550-1-git-send-email-paul.gortma...@windriver.com
> 
> To summarize what is said there, yes - you can ignore the one line
> removals for now.  We will revisit them after the above is merged.
> 

I've taken the RTC subsystem maintainership and I've been sorting the
2372 patches left in patchwork down to 126 and yours was one of these.

Seeing your answer, I think my question was legitimate. I'll be happy to
take your revised patch once ready.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to